In light of the new Genevan legislation, which encourages judges to rely even more on mediation in family law disputes, Josef Alkatout offers a critical perspective in the *Tribune de Genève*. While mediation is often praised as a quick, cost-effective, and stress-reducing alternative, he highlights the potential pitfalls of this practice. Particularly in complex or highly contentious cases—such as those involving hidden assets or a significant imbalance of power—a mere compromise does not necessarily guarantee a fair outcome. This article emphasizes that mediation can by no means blindly replace sound legal advice and proper judicial decision-making.
